5 Wild Flight Disruption Stories That will Leave You Speechless
Air travel is a convenient and efficient way to get from one place to another, but sometimes things don’t go as planned. Flight Disruption and cancellations are common occurrences, but sometimes the reasons for these disruptions are downright wild. Here are five unbelievable stories of flight disruptions that will leave you speechless.
1. First-Class Fiasco
During a Qantas Airways flight from Los Angeles to Melbourne, two first-class passengers caused a 30-minute delay because they were dissatisfied with the pajamas offered to them. They had requested XL-sized pajamas that were unavailable on this flight. The airline staff offered pajamas from business class instead, but the passengers refused, stating that they expected first-class products. The disgruntled pair left the aircraft, causing a delay and discomfort for other passengers.
2. Reptiles on the Loose
A man traveling from Cuba decided to bring his four pet iguanas along with him to Toronto. However, he had secretly stowed them away in his checked baggage on a WestJet flight without declaring them as part of his luggage. When the flight arrived in Toronto, customs discovered that two of the iguanas were missing. The passengers who had already boarded the next flight out to Vancouver had to be found, and the aircraft’s hold was scoured and fumigated to prevent the reptiles from potentially endangering the safety of the passengers.
3. A Stinky Situation
In two separate incidents, aircraft were delayed due to collisions with trucks carrying flight waste. At John F Kennedy Airport in New York, a truck carrying flight waste collided with a parked aircraft, causing a delay. Meanwhile, in Glasgow Airport in Scotland, a Loganair flight was hit by a lavatory maintenance truck, causing a three-hour delay. Passengers had to disembark and switch to a replacement aircraft to continue their journey.
4. Curfew Crisis
A flight from Dubai to London experienced a delay due to the need to remove some freight from the aircraft’s cargo hold to ensure safe flying conditions given the weather. The delay made it impossible for all passengers and baggage to disembark and for new travelers to board the return trip before Heathrow’s curfew. The ground crew tried to redirect the plane to Gatwick Airport, but the flight crew didn’t receive the message, causing the plane to take off late and eventually divert to Gatwick. Another aircraft with technical difficulties blocked the runway, causing further delay.
5. Captain Ripples, the Cockpit Cat
A flight from Halifax was delayed for hours due to an unexpected stowaway: a cat named Ripples. The feline had been safely secured in a designated pet carrier in the overhead compartment. However, a passenger mistakenly opened the door while attempting to store their own luggage, causing the cat to escape. Crew members searched the plane, even turning off the cockpit lights to coax the cat out of hiding. Ripples was eventually found in the wiring of the plane’s frame, causing a delay to check for damage before taking off.
These bizarre flight disruption stories show that sometimes the reasons for delays and cancellations are beyond our control. While they may seem humorous in hindsight, they can cause significant inconvenience and discomfort for passengers. It’s important to remember that safety should always be the top priority in air travel, and sometimes delays are necessary to ensure that everyone arrives at their destination safely.
Also, you might be interested in reading: Top 5: Unique Aircraft Hotels to Add to Your Travel Bucket List
- Source: Simple Flying
Qatar Airways vs. Airbus: The Ongoing Dispute over A350 Paint Issues
LAST UPDATE: 02/02/2023 – Qatar Airways and Airbus: Legal Dispute Resolved Amicably
In 2020, Qatar Airways sent one of its Airbus A350s to Ireland to receive a special World Cup livery. However, the plan went awry, and the jet returned to Toulouse without any paint. Fast forward to the present, a major conflict erupted between Qatar Airways and Airbus, leading to grounded planes, canceled orders, and a court case in London. While Airbus insists that the damage to Qatar Airways’ A350s is only superficial, the airline argues that aircraft are unsafe to fly without a permanent solution. Here is the full story of this ongoing dispute between Airbus and Qatar Airways.
January 2021: A350 Sent to Toulouse for Inspection Due to Reports of Cracks
In November 2020, Qatar Airways A350 (A7-ALL) was sent to Shannon, Ireland, to receive a special World Cup livery. However, the aircraft did not return to Qatar by the end of the year. Instead, it was sent to Airbus in Toulouse for further inspection due to reports of cracks found under the paintwork. Airbus described these issues as “irregularities on the surface coating”, and stated that the problem was superficial/cosmetic and only visible when the top coat of paint is stripped.
2021 Mid-Year: Airbus delivery halt due to A350 Paint Conflict
May 31st: at the end of May, Qatar Airways CEO, Al Baker, announced that the airline may stop taking delivery of all aircraft produced by Airbus. The reason for this decision was an ongoing issue with the manufacturer. However, the specific issue was not disclosed. This statement indicated a potential deterioration of the relationship between the two companies.
June 8th: Qatar Airways halted the delivery of the Airbus A350 on June 8th, 2021 aircraft due to an ongoing dispute with the manufacturer. The airline has reportedly rejected several proposed fixes from Airbus for issues found on their A350s, describing them as unsafe to fly without a permanent solution. On the other hand, Airbus has stated that the problems are only cosmetic. The two parties are set to take the case to the High Court in London. This move comes after Qatar Airways CEO Al Baker announced in May that the airline might stop taking delivery of all aircraft produced by Airbus but did not clarify the reason for the decision.
August 2021: Qatar Airways grounds 13 A350s
August 5th: Qatar Airways has escalated its dispute with Airbus by grounding 13 of its Airbus A350 aircraft at the start of August. The decision was made in compliance with the advice of the Qatar Civil Aviation Authority. Airbus, however, maintains that the issues are superficial and that they have proposed solutions that have been rejected by Qatar Airways without valid reason.
November 2021: More airlines have paint issues
November 29th: According to a report by Reuters, several airlines have experienced paint issues on their Airbus A350s. The report states that Finnair, Cathay Pacific, Etihad (who has not yet flown the jet commercially) and Air Caraibes have all reported cosmetic damage to the paintwork on their A350s.
December 2021: Airbus and Qatar Airways begin legal proceedings
December 9th: Qatar Airways claims that the paint issue affects the aircraft’s safety. However, Airbus states that the damage is purely cosmetic in nature. The European manufacturer has announced that they are seeking an independent legal assessment. Although not mentioning Qatar Airways by name, Airbus stated, “The attempt by this customer to misrepresent this specific topic as an airworthiness issue represents a threat to the international protocols on safety matters.”
One week later…on December 20th, Qatar Airways initiated legal action against Airbus in the Technology and Construction division of the High Court in London.
January 2022: Dispute Escalates with Legal Action, A321neo Order Cancellations, and New Orders with the Competitor
January 6th: Per the court filing, the details of the claims made by Qatar Airways against Airbus have been made public. The airline is seeking $618 million in damages from Airbus and an additional $4 million each day that one of its A350s remains grounded. This would amount to the list price of an Airbus A350-900 every 80 days.
January 21st: as the dispute between the two companies intensified, it was reported that Airbus had terminated an unrelated order of 50 Airbus A321 aircraft that Qatar Airways had previously agreed to purchase. The manufacturer stated that the cancellation was made in accordance with their rights. In retaliation, Qatar Airways released a video displaying the damage that its Airbus A350 fleet had incurred. This was the first time that either party had revealed the extent of the damage seen on the aircraft.
January 31st: In response to the cancelation of its A321 order from Airbus, Qatar Airways has placed an order with Airbus’ competitor, Boeing. The order includes up to 100 aircraft, including 50 Boeing 737 MAXs to replace the A321s, and a new freighter order. Last summer, the competition between Airbus and Boeing was tight, but now, Qatar Airways had no other choice but to place the first order for the Boeing 777X freighter and commit to up to 50 aircraft.
February 2022: Order Decrease, Injunctions, and Damage Claims
February 8th: as reported by Reuters, Airbus’ January 2022 order books, released in early February, revealed that Qatar Airways’ orders for the A350 have decreased by two.
February 19th: A judge has ordered Airbus to prevent any “practical impact” of the A321neo order cancellation. This means that the manufacturer is not permitted to offer the aircraft to other airlines. However, this injunction is a temporary measure and the final decision will be evaluated at a court hearing scheduled for April.
February 28th: Airbus has requested a high court judge to award $220 million worth of damages for two A350 aircraft that were not accepted for delivery by Qatar Airways. Airbus argued in court that Qatar Airways and the Qatari regulator were involved in a wrongful collaboration or conspiracy, and/or acted in bad faith with regards to the grounding of the aircraft.
March 2022: New Safety Concerns
March 22nd: Qatar Airways has challenged the responsibility for Airbus’ $220 million damages claim for not accepting delivery of two A350s. The airline has stated that it has not violated its contract with the planemaker, and that Airbus has not provided an explanation for the $220 million figure.
March 30th: as part of the ongoing legal dispute between Qatar Airways and Airbus, court documents were released that indicate the airline’s concerns about paint degradation on the A350s. Qatar Airways references a safety assessment by EASA from April 2021, which warns that damage to the paint could result in damage to the lightning mesh over the aircraft’s fuel tanks, leading to a possible fire in extreme cases.
April 2022: Qatar Airways Refuses Deliveries
April 4th: Qatar Airways refuses to accept new deliveries of Airbus A350 aircraft until its current concerns are resolved to its satisfaction, resulting in the refusal of a third A350 aircraft delivery. Due to this, Airbus reportedly canceled the order.
April 26th: The court has determined that the Airbus A350 and A321neo orders are included in a cross-default clause and therefore, Qatar Airways’ refusal of A350 deliveries is a valid reason for canceling the A321neo order. As a result, Airbus is permitted to offer the slots intended for Qatar Airways to other customers. This decision does not prevent Qatar Airways from contesting the action in a full trial in the future.
May 26th: the High Court in London has ruled on the preliminary case between Airbus and Qatar Airways, and it has been expedited in the public interest. The case is set to be held over a three-month period in Summer of 2023. Both parties are pleased that the matter is progressing. However, Airbus still prefers to reach a resolution outside of court.
May 31st: After the High Court’s ruling, both Airbus and Qatar Airways released statements. Qatar Airways expressed satisfaction with the outcome, while Airbus disputed the airline’s statement, calling it a “complete mischaracterization of the UK High Court ruling”, and highlighting that Qatar Airways was ordered to pay 97% of Airbus’ costs.
September 2022: Airbus Cancels All Remaining A350 Orders from Qatar Airways
September 8th: Airbus announced that it had canceled all remaining orders of the A350 from Qatar Airways amid a safety and contractual dispute between the two companies. Qatar Airways had 19 pending orders for the A350-1000 model. The cancellation was confirmed by an Airbus spokesperson to Reuters following the release of the company’s monthly order data.
December 2022: Trial splits
December 16th: at a hearing in London, UK High Court Judge David Waksman ordered the multi-billion Qatar Airways and Airbus trial to be divided into two parts due to the high level of complexity involved. In May, the court had ruled in favor of an expedited trial, which would have taken place over roughly three months next summer, but now the case will be conducted in two parts, potentially extending the trial through 2024.
January 2023: Airbus Alters A350 Components and Qatar Airways Given Deadline to Produce Correspondence with QCAA on Aircraft Grounding
January 18th: Airbus has altered the components used in the fuselage of its A350 aircraft due to its ongoing legal dispute with Qatar Airways. The company has started using a different type of copper foil as the layering in new deliveries since late last year. The decision to switch to a new design is considered significant, despite Airbus asserting that the original design is still safe. According to Reuters, Airbus has switched from using expanded copper foil (ECF) to perforated copper foil (PCF) for the layering between the paint and carbon fuselage on the A350. The ECF plays a crucial role in ensuring the fuselage can withstand lightning strikes safely and is at the center of the $2 billion dispute between Airbus and Qatar Airways. Airbus has confirmed that the new PCF will be used on the rear fuselage for aircraft delivered at the end of 2022. The material was previously under consideration but was not incorporated into new jets. The company has acknowledged that the new material is lighter but will also address the ongoing cracking issue.
January 19th: Qatar Airways has been given a 13-week deadline to produce correspondence between itself and the Qatar Civil Aviation Authority (QCAA) regarding the grounding of the Airbus A350. Qatar Airways has consistently claimed that the QCAA was responsible for grounding the aircraft by revoking Airworthiness Review Certificates on 22 aircraft and preventing them from being used. A $2 billion legal dispute between Airbus and Qatar Airways has been ongoing for several months, as the two companies disagree on whether the paint degradation on some A350s is a safety concern. Yesterday’s court hearing was the latest development in the ongoing conflict, during which Airbus disclosed that it had made some design changes to the aircraft.
January 31st: Airbus and Qatar Airways are approaching a settlement in their disagreement over the A350 dispute. Despite months of public disagreement, it’s uncertain if an agreement will be reached as previous efforts to avoid a London trial have failed. However, two people with knowledge of the situation reported to Reuters, that negotiations have picked up the pace, and the tone seems more positive after a successful meeting between both companies and regulators in Doha. Read more about this update: Airbus and Qatar Airways Near Agreement in A350 Dispute.
February 2023: Legal Dispute Resolved Amicably!
Qatar Airways and Airbus have resolved their legal dispute regarding the paint degradation of the Airbus A350 aircraft. The dispute, which had been ongoing for nearly two years and reached the High Court in London, has come to an amicable settlement. Both parties have released a joint statement regarding the resolution.
READ MORE ABOUT THIS UPDATE: Qatar Airways and Airbus: Legal Dispute Resolved Amicably
The ongoing dispute between Qatar Airways and Airbus over paint issues on the airline’s A350 fleet has escalated over the past year, leading to grounded planes, canceled orders, and a court case in London. While Airbus insists that the damage to Qatar Airways’ A350s is only superficial, the airline argues that the aircraft are unsafe to fly without a permanent solution.
The conflict has raised concerns about the integrity of the paintwork on A350s operated by other airlines as well. As the legal proceedings continue, the outcome of this dispute will have significant implications for both Qatar Airways and Airbus and the aviation industry as a whole.
It is crucial that the safety of passengers and crew is the top priority, and the solution that will be reached will be the one that guarantees that. With all this in mind, one question that arises is: Will the safety concerns raised by Qatar Airways be addressed and resolved, or will this be just the tip of the iceberg? What do you think? Tell us in the comments section below.
- Simple flying
- Featured Photo Source: fl360aero
Anju Khatiwada: Husband and Wife: Same Love, Same Death
Last Sunday, 15th January 2023, the world witnessed a disastrous plane crash near the airport of Pokhara, a tourist town in Nepal. This deadliest accident was the end of the lives of 72 persons, 68 passengers, and four crew members. Our hearts are with the families of the victims. No words can really describe this tragedy. However, there is a deeply sad story behind the death of one of the victims, Anju Khatiwada, the plane’s co-pilot, but what is it?
Anju Khatiwada had nearly 6,400 hours of flying experience.
The full report of Yeti Airlines’ incident:
Yeti Airlines ATR 72 with 72 Onboard Crashes in Pokhara – Aviation for Aviators
Anju Khatiwada’s husband:
Dipak Pokhrel, Anju Khatiwada’s husband, was a co-pilot of Yeti Airlines. However, he died in a plane crash. A small passenger plane went down before landing, causing a crash that was the reason behind the death of Pokrel in June 2006. But how Anju Khatiwada faced the death of her beloved husband.
After his death:
There is a saying, “Disasters and crises bring out the best in us.” This is exactly what happened toKhatiwada. Despite her sorrow and grief of losing her husband, she decided to follow his steps in aviation. After four years after the painful death of her husband, Anju Khatiwada joined the same airline as her husband, Yeti Airlines, to be a co-pilot. However, who knows that following the same path will lead to the same sad ending? After 20 years, the journey of co-pilot Anju Khatiwada ended in a plane crash. However, let’s not forget the great achievements of Anju Khatiwada.
Achievements commemorate humans:
Our heroin co-pilot did many compliments that will keep her in our memories forever. Except for trying to continue her husband’s dream in aviation, Anju Khatiwada was one of the only six female Yeti Airlines employees as pilots. She also had flown almost 6400 hours. We can only say that Anju’s life ended with dignity while she was performing her duty.
On This Day in 2009: The Airbus A320 That Landed on the Hudson River
On January 15th, 2009, US Airways Flight 1549 made history by successfully ditching in the Hudson River, resulting in no fatalities. This event is considered one of aviation’s greatest survival stories. As we reflect on the 14th anniversary of this incident, let’s delve into the story of the “Miracle on the Hudson.”
Miracle on the Hudson: How everything began?
On January 15th of 2009, a US Airways flight 1549 from New York’s LaGuardia Airport to Charlotte, North Carolina, left the tarmac at 15:25 with 155 passengers on board an Airbus A320 led by Captain Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger III who is a 57-year-old former Air Force fighter pilot and a 29-year veteran of US Airways, and the Copilot Jeff Skiles.
Everything was alright for the first 90 seconds after airborne until something caught the eye of the Copilot (“Jeff Skiles”) at 3,000 feet; he saw a flock of Canada geese headed toward the plane, and he shouted: “Birds!!”; moments later, the geese struck the fuselage, wings, and engines.
The passengers felt a powerful thud against the airplane, along with severe vibrations from the engines and a loud explosion. The cabin was then filled up with smoke, a horrible smell came to be, and then an eerie quiet: both engines were disabled.
The reaction of the pilot: just crazy!
Sullenberger made the mayday radio call to the Air Traffic Control (ATC): “Mayday, Mayday, Mayday, followed with the explanation of the situation but calmly.” They discussed their options. It was either to return to LaGuardia or to land at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey, as it was the closest Airport to them. But surprisingly, Sullenberger decided on a radical move: He’d ditch the plane in the Hudson River!!
We all know that neither the Airbus A320 nor any other passenger plane is built to land on water!
“Brace for impact,” said Sullenberger through the intercom. Passengers thought they were going to die, as anyone in this situation would think. The flight attendants start yelling: “Brace! Brace! Brace! Heads down! Stay down!”.
The ‘wet’ touchdown
Sullenberger lowered the plane’s nose in a gradual glide toward the river. The plane managed to clear the George Washington Bridge, and, against the odds, he landed safely on the surface of the Hudson. It skidded across the water at 145 mph and finally slowed to a stop!
He jumped out of his seat quickly, went out of the cockpit, and shouted: “Evacuate the plane!”
His job was now to get all passengers out of the plane, which was quickly filling up with water. Witnesses were convinced that everyone on this flight was dead. What they couldn’t see was that passengers were already exiting the plane. With water seeping into the plane, Sullenberger and Skiles walked the length of the cabin twice, calling “Is anyone there?!”. The water was too cold, they had to walk on top of the seats. But they would not leave the plane until they were sure everyone was out.
Thankfully 154 men, women, and children owed their lives to a modest man who faced adversity with cool competence on one of the most remarkable days in aviation history.
“He’s the man,” said one of the rescued passengers. “If you want to talk to a hero, get a hold of him.”
“He was thinking in nanoseconds,” said a dormer airline pilot, speaking of Sullenberger. “He made all the right choices at all the right times. He might have been staring at the instrument, but he was feeling that airplane in his hands. He picked his landing spot and went for it”.
After all the thanking was over, Sullenberger was humble. “You’re welcome,” he said simply. Like most heroes, he didn’t want the label. According to him, he was just doing his job.
In 2016, many people relived what happened when a movie was made about the ‘Miracle on the Hudson’ named “Sully.” Tom Hanks was representing Sullenberger; the movie was directed by Clint Eastwood and won several awards. I recommend watching it if you didn’t do so yet!
- Featured Image: Getty Images
Crucial Factors Affecting Aircraft Takeoff Distance and What Pilots Can Do About It
Air India Express Launches Nationwide Recruitment Drive
Turkish Airlines Gears Up for Massive 600 Aircraft Order Announcement
SAUDIA and Kuwait Airways Announce Codeshare Agreement
Video: Cargolux Boeing 747 Loses Part of Landing Gear During Emergency Landing
Why the Airbus A380 Only Utilizes Reverse Thrust on Its Inner Engines
Boeing Dreamlifter: A Masterpiece of Ingenuity and Function
Jet Engines: How They Work and Power Modern Aviation?
Mexican Government Finalizes Sale of Presidential Boeing 787 to Tajikistan
American Airlines Boeing 737 Suffers Engine Flameout After Hitting Flock of Geese
boeing2 years ago
Why Doesn’t The Boeing 737 Have Landing Gear Doors?
Aviation Stories7 months ago
A Boeing 747 Once Flew With 5 Engines
Aviation News6 months ago
Antonov An-225 to be Rebuilt After Being Destroyed in Ukraine
airbus2 years ago
Airbus Beluga vs Boeing Dreamlifter
Informative2 months ago
Can a Plane Retract its Landing Gear While Still on the Ground?
Informative6 months ago
Why Does The Airbus A340 Have 4 Smaller Engines?
Informative1 year ago
Why Do We Board Planes From The Left-Hand Side?
Informative2 years ago
Antonov An-225 Mriya: The Plane With 32 Wheels